The Jacinta Allan Labor government 2025 Victorian Retirement Villages Act perpetuates the rip-off of charging a purchase price without gaining ownership, only occupancy in a retirement village. VOTE NO.
Retirement Village information for consumers.
Retirement village information for consumers.
Saturday, April 5, 2025
Friday, April 4, 2025
Currently Victorian retirement village residents wait 6 months for repayment of their refundable amount on leaving a village. The Jacinta Allan Labor government has pushed that out to 12. Why? Only 1 winner the operators pockets. Elderly Victorians lose, what do they live on, how do they go forward.
Sunday, March 30, 2025
What is wrong with Victorian Retirement Villages
Victorian retirement village residents find that there is almost zero protection when something goes wrong, or the system to obtain that protection is so cumbersome, so demanding on them, that surrender is ultimately the chosen option. And village operators know that and use it to their own financial advantage.
All this from a Victorian Labor government that fails to enforce the law as it is currently written, let alone to improve it to protect the very people it was originally written to protect.
"The law was clearly on the side of the village residents. It was a lack of access to affordable, quick, decisive enforcement of the law that failed them most". - Retvilldotnet
Retirement villages, the process of for-profit operators seeking financial reward from this commercial activity under the guise of the provision of benevolent housing for older Victorians. Sadly and particularly in Victoria the commercial risks to operators are dampened by statute whilst at the same time the commercial rewards are enhanced by statute.
For Victorian retirees who make that fateful decision to enter a retirement village it is the complete opposite. The payment of the capital value of the village unit, not for ownership simply occupancy. The payment of all the costs of property ownership with none of the rewards.
"Families need to be aware that what we are talking about here is the transfer of intergenerational wealth, not to families but into the pockets of corporations. Shame about the elderly not having enough money for aged care."
So what is wrong with Victorian Retirement villages, the answer is -
- Bureaucrats who don't really know or fully understand the product they are producing legislation for.
- Legislators who don't really know or fully understand the product they are enacting legislation for.
- State Governments who are far too easily seduced by slick marketing from the industry.
- A failure of all of the three parties above to listen to the one group of people who really do know and fully understand the product, the village residents and their families.
Wednesday, February 5, 2025
Intergenerational Capital Wealth Lost
Retirees don't deserve the financial disaster that comes from downsizing from the family home into a retirement village. @SffpVictoria @ademsomyurek @_davidlimbrick @georgievpurcell @rachelpaynemp @dettershankMP @BradBattinMP @DavidDavisMLC @NStaikos #springst @AivGoesGreen pic.twitter.com/zSxfvEk82u
— Les Scobie (@retvilldotnet) February 4, 2025
Transfer of Capital Wealth
Retirement village analysis shows the dominant financial model for retirement villages the loan lease model is causing a demonstrative transfer of capital from residents and their families to operator corporations. https://t.co/4zW6TvuCXF @MichaelWestBiz @consumervic #springst
— Les Scobie (@retvilldotnet) February 3, 2025
Retirement Village Residents Get Trampled
@VictorianLabor has trampled some 36,000 retirees in retirement villages by making them wait 12 months to get their money back on leaving a village. Insulting them by saying probate takes longer than six months. @NStaikos @JaclynSymes @TimMcCurdyMP @consumervic @abc730 #SpringSt pic.twitter.com/GtDQ1xOOPF
— Les Scobie (@retvilldotnet) February 2, 2025
Thursday, January 30, 2025
Retirement Villages a purchase price without ownership
VOTE NO to the new Retirement Villages Act.
The new act perpetuates the retiree rip-off by charging a 'purchase price without property ownership' to obtain entry.
The village owner/operator is authorised by the act to transfer all the costs of property ownership to the retiree whilst retaining all the benefits for themselves.
The business model inherent within the act hides what is simply residential tenancy by any other name but a demonstrably higher price.