Showing posts with label Retirement Villages. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Retirement Villages. Show all posts

Sunday, March 30, 2025

What is wrong with Victorian Retirement Villages

The critical importance of retirement village resident submissions to Victorian state government inquiries is that they are actually living the experience not simply 'working in the field'. They know what is wrong because they have experienced it, suffered from it.

Victorian retirement village residents find that there is almost zero protection when something goes wrong, or the system to obtain that protection is so cumbersome, so demanding on them, that surrender is ultimately the chosen option. And village operators know that and use it to their own financial advantage.

All this from a Victorian Labor government that fails to enforce the law as it is currently written, let alone to improve it to protect the very people it was originally written to protect.

"The law was clearly on the side of the village residents. It was a lack of access to affordable, quick, decisive enforcement of the law that failed them most". - Retvilldotnet

Retirement villages, the process of for-profit operators seeking financial reward from this commercial activity under the guise of the provision of benevolent housing for older Victorians. Sadly and particularly in Victoria the commercial risks to operators are dampened by statute whilst at the same time the commercial rewards are enhanced by statute. 

For Victorian retirees who make that fateful decision to enter a retirement village it is the complete opposite. The payment of the capital value of the village unit, not for ownership simply occupancy. The payment of all the costs of property ownership with none of the rewards.

"Families need to be aware that what we are talking about here is the transfer of intergenerational wealth, not to families but into the pockets of corporations. Shame about the elderly not having enough money for aged care."

So what is wrong with Victorian Retirement villages, the answer is -

  1. Bureaucrats who don't really know or fully understand the product they are producing legislation for.
  2. Legislators who don't really know or fully understand the product they are enacting legislation for.
  3. State Governments who are far too easily seduced by slick marketing from the industry.
  4. A failure of all of the three parties above to listen to the one group of people who really do know and fully understand the product, the village residents and their families. 
Village residents understand because they suffer financially from the legislative inequities produced by Bureaucrats, Legislators, State Governments.


retirement village poverty trap






Thursday, January 30, 2025

Retirement Villages a purchase price without ownership

 VOTE NO to the new Retirement Villages Act.

The new act perpetuates the retiree rip-off by charging a 'purchase price without property ownership' to obtain entry. 

The village owner/operator is authorised by the act to transfer all the costs of property ownership to the retiree whilst retaining all the benefits for themselves.

The business model inherent within the act hides what is simply residential tenancy by any other name but a demonstrably higher price.


vote no to retirement villages


Tuesday, January 28, 2025

Retirement Villages What is Wrong

 What is wrong with Victorian loan/lease retirement villages? 

  1. Property Ownership is never granted.
  2. You paid for it but you don't get to own it. 
  3. You only 'rent' it. 
  4. This through deceptive names like 'entry payment' and 'deferred management fee' that obscure the true $ cost.
  5. You pay for management of the property even though you don't own it.
  6. You pay for upkeep of the property even though you don't own it.
  7. At the end of your occupancy you can even pay to renovate the property you never owned.
retirement village rent lease


Monday, January 27, 2025

Deferred Management Fee Nonsense

The Jacinta Allan Government new definition of the 'Deferred Management Fee' as a fee for 'services' has ZERO functionality. 

This change is from the new proposed Victorian Retirement Villages Act.

ZERO functionality comes from the fact that village residents already pay 100% of the cost of 100% of the management services that Victorian retirement village operators claim and charge for as necessary to successfully operate the village.

Under Australian consumer law an operator cannot charge for ‘services’ where 1. there is no intent to supply or 2. no supply has in fact been made.

Competition & Consumer Act 2010
Chapter 3. 3-1 Unfair practices. Division 1. 36 - Wrongly Accepting Payment.

36-1 A person must not, in trade or commerce, accept payment or other consideration for goods or services if, at the time of the acceptance, the person intends not to supply the goods or services.

36-4 A person who, in trade or commerce, accepts payment or other consideration for goods or services must supply all the goods or services:

WHAT ARE THE NEW FEES?

HOW CAN THEY BE SUBSTANTIATED?

deferred management fee


Tuesday, January 21, 2025

Retirement Villages Look Before You Leap

When it comes to Victorian retirement villages the old adage of Look Before You Leap has never been more true. 

The new Jacinta Allan, Nick Staikos, Consumer Affairs Victoria operator centric 2025 version of the retirement villages act makes it even more imperative.

Research, research, research, the best outcome may be not to leap at all.
 

Sunday, January 19, 2025

Retirement Village More Costly than a Residential Tenancy

Victorian Retirement Village residents can pay multiple times the cost of a residential tenancy for what is the same primary product, residential accommodation. Retirement villages are all smoke and mirrors hiding the true cost. 

Property ownership through retention of the family home or a true Body Corporate retirement village the only defence. 

retirement village versus a residential tenancy


Saturday, January 11, 2025

Sting in the tail for Victorian retirees

Sting in the tail for Victorian retirees as the Jacinta Allan Labor government moves to enhance profits of retirement village operators. 

Hollow claims of striking a balance between facilitating industry growth and innovation with retirement village resident consumer protections.

sting in the tail for retirement village residents


Friday, January 10, 2025

Retirement Village Residents Trapped Financially

The realisation of far to many retirement village residents and it comes too late for anything to be done about it. 

Financially trapped into the village due to the business model enforced by the Jacinta Allan Labor government legislation.

retirement village residents screwed


Victorian Government moves against Retirees

The Victorian Jacinta Allan Labor Government is moving against Victorian retirees by mandating that retirement village residents will now have to wait 12 months to get their refundable money back on leaving the village. 

How do they fund themselves over that period? An absolute con job by the industry.

The government seduced by the industry into believing that they do not have the money to repay the outgoing retiree. This money was paid to the village operator by the retiree before they could move into the village.

It shows a clear failure of the industry to manage cash flow, and a clear failure of the government to understand the principle of cash flow management.

retirees 12 months wait for refundable amount



Wednesday, January 8, 2025

Allan Labor Government Hates Retirees

 Why does the Jacinta Allan Victorian Government hate retirement village residents?

Why does the Victorian government love retirement village operators by contracts requiring residents to pay an ingoing contribution, or entry fee, or buying price, to get into a residential tenancy independent living  unit, ILU, in a retirement village where they can be charged deferred and multiple split priced rentals.

The Victorian Jacinta Allan Labor Government 2025 version of the “ingoing contribution” Retirement Village loan/lease business model denies property ownership to a retiree for merely conditional occupancy, a 'residential tenancy' by any other name. This action hidden within a convoluted and misleading occupancy contract. 

Despite the payment by the retiree of an 'ingoing contribution' often commensurate with an ownership cost, actual property ownership is held by the operator. In a further burden on the retiree the financial benefits of this 'property ownership' are retained by the village operator whilst all the financial costs of this 'property ownership' are transferred on to the retiree. 

To rub further salt into the wound there is a Deferred Management Fee for the retiree to pay which can be as high as 40% on the 'ingoing contribution' paid. This fee is essentially a 'rental' payment by any other name hence the claim by retirees of paying double the odds, property ownership costs without the ownership plus a substantial 'rental' fee which by government statute is not allowed to be called 'rent'.

With receipt of the ingoing contribution and the retention of property ownership, retirement village operators can by statute transfer ownership costs and add a deceptively termed deferred fee, essentially a rental component, into complex contracts to double the effective rental over the retiree's occupancy period.

Legislators and Consumer Affairs Victoria have consistently failed to identify the spectacular profit increase by the operators using this Loan/Lease business model. A model which uses ambiguous and misleading mechanisms to hide the true cost of the occupancy in relation to the comparative market rate for residential tenancy. Only property ownership for the retiree can negate the blatant deception of Victoria's retirees, retirees who make the financially devastating decision to spend most if not all of their lifetime accumulated asset base to enter a retirement village.

On having entered the loan/lease retirement village the asset base is diminished over time through the cost of property ownership but without the ownership, the cost of the 'rental' deceptively named the deferred management fee, the further destruction of their asset base by the devaluation impact of inflation over the length of the occupancy period.

The Victorian loan/lease model for retirement village is best summed up -                                                          "What we are talking about here is the transfer of intergenerational wealth, not to families, but into the pockets of corporations. Shame about the elderly not having enough money for aged care."

Allan Labor Government hates retirement village residents


Monday, January 6, 2025

Retirement Village Scales of Justice against Retirees

When it comes to the new Jacinta Allan Government Retirement Villages Act 2025. 

The scales of justice weigh heavily in favour of the retirement village operator and against the retiree.

retirement village scales of justice


Saturday, January 4, 2025

Pro Operator Anti Resident Retirement Village Reports

Victorian retirement village operators won the quinella with these two pro operator anti resident documents tabled in parliament. 


Both the 2017 Legal and Social Issues Committee report and the proposed 2025 Retirement Villages Act set back the position of Victorian retirees they are supposed to defend.

retirement village pro operator anti resident

Wednesday, January 1, 2025

Retirement Village Poverty Trap More Prevalent

 Victorian Labor have made it worse not better for retirees in the new Victorian Retirement Villages Act. The financially destructive poverty trap will be even more prevalent in retirement villages than before.

retirement village poverty trap


Tuesday, December 31, 2024

Retirement Villages No Longer Utopia

Moneywise reports - 'Retirement villages were supposed to be ‘utopia’ for senior Australians — instead, residents received life in financial prison and ‘corporatised elder abuse’.


Click here for the full article - Retirement Villages were supposed to be Utopia

Friday, December 27, 2024

New Vic Retirement Villages Act a Real Stinker

The new Victorian Retirement Villages Act 2024 is a real stinker for village residents. Pro operator. Anti retiree.

Wednesday, December 18, 2024

What is a Retirement Village

 

Tuesday, December 17, 2024

Vic Retirement Village Act for Operators not Residents

Sunday, December 15, 2024

Vic Government Fails Retirement Village Residents

Thursday, December 12, 2024

Vic Labor government fails to understand retirement village cash flow management