In this example a retiree has access to $850,00.00 in capital and can face the following options.
- Purchase a lease/licence enabling the retiree to occupy a unit in a Retirement Village. The Deferred Management Fee is 35% of the entry cost of $850,000.00 plus annual maintenance fees and a unit refurbishment cost on departure. The retiree obtains 0% of any capital gain in the value of the unit.
- Purchase a lease/licence enabling the retiree to occupy a unit in a Retirement Village. The Deferred Management Fee is 35% of the entry cost of $850,000.00 plus annual maintenance fees and a unit refurbishment cost on departure. The retiree obtains 100% of any capital gain in the value of the unit.
- The retiree could rent a communsurate property within the general community and pay a weekly rental amount.
- Stay in the family home.
The graph and the tables below illustrate the dramatic reduction in capital wealth of the retiree over just a 7 year occupancy period within a retirement village. Financial outcomes can depend on the contractural provisions offered by the village operator. Renting a property within the general community can have a much less dramatic impact on capital wealth but as in all financial decisions there are multiple issues to consider.
Scenarios are illustrated using standard retirement industry parameters:-
Option 1.
- Deferred Management Fee of 35% on the in-going value of village unit.
- 0% of the capital gain to the village resident.
- Maintenance fees
- Unit refurbishment cost.
Results Option 1 -
Village Resident Start - $850,000.00 Finish - $228,087.00
A capital reduction of minus $621,913.00
Option 2.
- Deferred Management fee of 35% on the out-going value of village unit.
- 100% of any capital gain to the village resident.
- Maintenance fees.
- Unit refurbishment cost.
Results Option 2 -
Village Resident Start - $850,000.00 Finish - $493,373.00
A capital reduction of minus $356,627.00
Note:- This improved result over Option 1 is totally dependent on the size of any capital gain. Should there be 50% less capital gain ($204,066.00) the result would be a capital reduction of minus $560,693.00.
Option 3 -
- Rental property value $850,000.00
- Rental return to Landlord initially 5% then a 5% annual increase in rent
- Retiree retains $850,000.00, the proceeds from the sale of the family home
- Retiree invests the retained capital, calculation uses 4% return on investment compounded
Results Option 3 -
Renter Start - $850,000.00 Finish - $772,506.00
A capital reduction of minus $ 77,494.00
Graph 1
Table - Option 1
Table - Option 2
Table - Option 3
[blog_subscription_form]
No comments:
Post a Comment